However, I am not against muslim religion either. To me, a religion is just like any opinion. There are positive and negative side in it. It's important to examine every opinion closely and see what's really going on behind the scheme.
So yea, many of my ideas will be opposed by many religious groups, especially from non secular religious groups, like muslims. However, some of their ideas are similar to mine.
For example, I know a succesful muslim entrepreneur that supports polygamy. I have nothing against the poly part in polygamy. I have a lot against the gamy part. However, if it is consensual, who am I to argue?
I am quite impress with the fact that some muslims, just like many christians, embrace more extreme form of capitalism, and hence freedom than I am.
I do support free market, but not to that extreme. Well, let's see what I am actually proposing to the world, and see that we may have some things in common.
Like most religious right wings, I suggest that the productive should make more money. You see, there isn't much alternative to this. If we do not let the productive to earn more money, the best and brightests among us will simply earn their wealth through other means.
So, we have an agreement here.
Then, women prefer the rich. Christians right wings limit one wife to each male. Muslim right wings allow more. I am a Christian, but I must give kudo to the muslim on this part. Oh by the way, anti polygamy laws within christianity is not really part of the scripture. It's just that most Christians believe it is, though some Christians group do not.
Again, all groups have their fair share of prejudices. If polygamy is allowed, many males will not get women. Obviously those males would love to embrace any religious pretext that put polygamy on bad light.
Then what?
Of course, a male with more women will make more kids. So far, I don't think my opinion is still far from my muslim entrepreneurs reference.
Then? Under Muslim religions, the poor get zakat, of 2%. This is where I differ. The world is getting more and more abundance. Don't we want to get rich as much as possible with no or little income tax? Don't we want to chase as many females as possible? Why be stingy about it? Why just 2%?
I suggest that we tax kids. I also suggest that we minimize governments' program and expenditure. When goverments expenditure is low and and governments income is high, goverments will have huge surplus defisit, which we shall call profit. Those surplus can be share to all citizens as stock holders. That way, poor people that postpone making kids will have huge initial capital to catch up the wealth of the rich.
So you see, if we want a good life, we should do so in a way that makes the other side profited too.
Now, when many alpha males get more than one females the other males don't get any. So what's the solution? What's the ancient religious solution? Jihad? No kidding.
In fact, that's explain why we have so many war in the world. The way we evolve is when we're not at war, we're in a race.
When we're in a race, we're in competition. Freedom means competition. Some people don't want to compete. So they oppose freedom.
That's the real intensive behind communism. Not to fed the poor, but to prevent you from getting rich. Women prefer the rich, so unproductive people hate the rich.
That's why the most prosecuted minority groups are often those who make the most money. The kids that got beaten up in school is the one the smartest.
So, what's the solution for the best and brightest? Choosing not to be succesful? That's lame.
However, some humans are so smart, they look beyond what businessmen see. Those people are politicians.
So what do politicians do? When we're not at war, we're in a race. If we're in a race, people will want to knock up those who run the fastest, which is me. So we shouldn't be in race. That means we should be in, guess what, war.
A wise politicians then pick of enemies for their people to fight for any reason. It's common enemies and common competitors that can unite people.
A chinese proverb says, the wise see the truth behind all religions. However, the narrow minded only see the differences. Correction chineses. Those who only see the differences are not the narrow minded. Those are the smart ass. Smart ass politicians see every little different between religions and use it as justification for war. That's how it really works.
Put yourself in a Sultan shoes. A sultan want a full harem. If the Sultan get all the women, most males would want to be Sultan. That means killing the current Sultan. So what would a wise Sultan do? Wage Jihad against Europeans. When the europeans are gone, a wise Sultan will wage Jihad against fellow muslims.
To be fair, muslim Sultans are not the only one doing it. European kings and Chinese emperors are into it too.
And what's the biblical solution? Well, you can read that in Number 20:13-14. God command those people to kill all the males and rape all the females. Of course, nowadays, even porn is sin. Yea right.
Got that far? I am just trying to explain what's really going on here.
Is war necessary? Is there a more humane solution? Of course there is. What happen is, we can legalize prostitution and porn. So all those poor people will have enough cash to catch up the wealth of the rich, and enough entertaintment till they get rich.
When that happen, most poor people will not mind voting in favor of free market. This one, I believe, most religious leaders would oppose.
Article Source:http://www.articles321.com
|